Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:32

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Inbox: This will be a tough roster to crack - Green Bay Packers
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are the signs of legitimate BPO project opportunities versus scams?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do so many people like life?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why do I feel sleepy after massage?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Knicks' Decision to Fire Tom Thibodeau Was Brewing For 'Months' - Sports Illustrated
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Aflac: Hackers May Have Customers' Personal Data - Newser
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why did Donald Trump and Melania Trump sleep in different rooms?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Research roundup: Ping-pong bots, the genetic key for ginger cats, and more - Ars Technica